In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has barred YouTubers Ranveer Allahbadia, Samay Raina, and Apoorva Mukhija from airing any show until further notice. The decision comes amid legal proceedings surrounding Allahbadia’s controversial remarks on Raina’s YouTube show. The apex court’s order adds to the growing scrutiny of online content and the responsibilities of digital creators.
The controversy erupted when multiple FIRs were filed against Allahbadia in Maharashtra and Assam, prompting him to seek protection from arrest. His remarks, made during a roast-style discussion, were deemed objectionable by various groups, leading to widespread backlash. The Supreme Court noted the public outrage and directed authorities to refrain from registering any further FIRs on the same issue.
Additionally, the court imposed travel restrictions on Allahbadia, instructing him to surrender his passport at the Thane police station. This move prevents him from leaving the country without prior judicial approval. The legal proceedings highlight the judiciary’s increasing focus on the regulation of digital content and its impact on public sentiment.
During the hearing, the bench, comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Kotiswar Singh, expressed strong disapproval of Allahbadia’s remarks. The justices questioned the counsel about the boundaries of free speech, emphasizing that popularity does not grant individuals the liberty to make offensive statements. Their comments reflected a growing concern over the influence of social media personalities and their accountability.
The court’s remarks underscored the broader debate on online speech and obscenity laws. “There is something very dirty in his mind that has been vomited,” the justices observed, criticizing the YouTuber’s lack of responsibility. As the case unfolds, the ruling serves as a cautionary precedent for digital influencers, reinforcing that freedom of expression comes with legal and ethical obligations.
